Theft, fraud & robbery offences handled successfully
by our experienced specialist senior lawyers!
Expert lawyers with outstanding results.

Fixed fee court appearance offer from $990*.
No obligation case assessment and/or free initial consult.

Theft

Any crime of dishonesty can have an impact on your life that far outweighs the actual legal penalties of being found guilty. If you are charged, you can be confident that Goldman and Co Lawyers will give you the best possible defence if you wish to plead not guilty.

If you are willing to plead not guilty, there are discounts available for an early guilty plea and we are experts in providing sentencing submissions that highlight the positive aspects of your character and your case.

Larceny

Larceny is often referred to as stealing. Regardless of whether you steal the item from a store, a person’s backpack, or from a towel on the beach, the elements of the offence are the same.

What the prosecution must prove

Before you can be found guilty of larceny, the prosecution has to prove all of these six factors:

  • You took and carried away property
  • The property that was taken belonged to someone else
  • The person who owned the property did not give permission for you to take it
  • You did not intend to return the property to the owner
  • You did not have a ‘claim of right’ to the property
  • You took the property dishonestly

The penalties

For matters finalised in the Local Court:

  • If the value of the property is $2,000 or less, the maximum penalty is 2 years’ imprisonment and/or a fine of $2,200.
  • If the value of the property is more than $2,000 and less than or equal to $5,000, the maximum penalty is 2 years’ imprisonment and/or a fine of $5,500.
  • If the value of the property is more than $5,000 then the maximum penalty is 2 years’ imprisonment and/or a fine of $11,000.
  • If the matter is finalised in the District Court then the maximum penalty increases to 5 years’ imprisonment.

Do you have a defence

There are defences available depending on the circumstances of each case. Standard defences to consider are:

Where you believe that you had a claim of right to the property

The claim of right must be one that involves a belief as to the right to the property or money in the hands of another. The claim must be genuinely, that is, honestly held — whether it was well founded in fact or law or not. While the belief does not have to be reasonable, a colourable pretence is insufficient

Where you did not act dishonestly

You have to establish that this was an honest mistake. You may have picked up an identical bag at the airport, or you may have borrowed something and forgotten to return it.

Duress

HYPERLINK TO SIMILIA CONTENT IN ASSAULT

Necessity

HYPERLINK TO SIMILIA CONTENT IN ASSAULT

Consent

If it can be established that the owner of the property gave you consent to take it into your possession, this is a defence to the charge of larceny.

Mental Illness

This requires proof that you suffered from a mental illness when you committed the offence and that because of this you didn’t understand that a reasonable person would consider what you were doing was wrong.

Break and enter

There are a variety of break and enter offences in the Crimes Act. The most typical form of break and enter is a break into a commercial or private residence in order to steal property.

The penalties can be harsher if you committed the offence in circumstances of aggravation. New South Wales retains the highest full-time imprisonment rate for break and enter/burglary offences (77%), across Australia when the offence is dealt with on indictment in a middle tier jurisdictionAggravating circumstances include being armed, being in company, if you hurt somebody during the commission of the offence or if you deprive somebody of their liberty.

Part 4, Div 1, Subdivision 4 Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) (“the Act”) contains a number of break and enter offences. These include:

  • break out of a dwelling-house after committing, or enter with intent to commit, an indictable offence (s 109, maximum penalty 14 years
  • break, enter and assault with intent to murder (s 110, maximum penalty 25 years)
  • enter a dwelling house with intent to commit a serious indictable offence (s 111, maximum penalty 10 years)
  • break, enter and commit a serious indictable offence (s 112, maximum penalty 14 years)
  • break and enter with intent to commit a serious indictable offence (s 113, maximum penalty 10 years)
  • being armed with intent to commit an indictable offence (s 114, maximum penalty 7 years), and
  • being a convicted offender armed with intent to commit an indictable offence (s 115, maximum penalty 10 years).

There are aggravated and specially aggravated forms of offences under ss 109, 111, 112 and 113 with corresponding greater maximum penalties.

Circumstances of aggravation, means circumstances involving any one or more of the following:

  • You are armed with an offensive weapon, or instrument;
  • You are in the company of another person or persons;
  • You use corporal violence on any person;
  • You intentionally or recklessly inflict actual bodily harm on any person;
  • You deprive any person of his or her liberty;
  • You know that there is a person, or that there are persons, in the place where the offence is alleged to be committed.

Circumstances of special aggravation, means circumstances involving any one or more of the following:

  • You intentionally wound or intentionally inflict grievous bodily harm on any person;
  • You inflict grievous bodily harm on any person and are reckless as to causing actual bodily harm to that or any other person,
  • You are armed with a dangerous weapon (a firearm, imitation firearm, a prohibited weapon or a spear gun).

What the prosecution must prove

Before you can be found guilty of break and enter the prosecution has to prove:

  • That you broke something;
  • That by breaking something you gained access into a house, residence or premises;
  • The you entered the house, residence or premises; and
  • That you either stole something or committed a serious indictable offence.

Break and enter may be actual or constructive. Actual breaking is where the security of the house is infringed though there not need be any breaking of any object see R v Smith (1827) 1 Mood 178.

Constructive breaking occurs when entry is obtained by fraud, or threats, or by the use of a key which the person is not entitled to use. The test is whether a person entering the house believed he had no authority to enter see R v Chandler [1913] 1 KB 125

The most serious form of break and enter is where the accused did the act knowing that there were people present and was prepared to use force against them in a robbery-like fashion. This is known as a "home invasion".

The penalties

Break and enter can be punished with a prison sentence of up to 2 years (if heard in the Local Court) or up to 14 years (if heard in the District Court).

If it is an “aggravated offence” the maximum period imprisonment increases up to 20 years.

If it is a “specially aggravated offence” the maximum imprisonment is up to 25 years.

Do you have a defence

There are defences available depending on the circumstances of each case. Standard defences to consider are:

Some of the possible defences available for those charged with Break and Enter can include:

To maintain your innocence if you did not commit the act;

To argue that you did not break anything;

To argue that what you broke did not allow you to access the house or premises;

To argue that you did not enter the house or premises;

To argue that you did not steal anything or that you did not commit a strictly indictable offence; or

Duress – If you were compelled to act in a certain way due to the circumstances, or the threats of another you may be able to argue duress.

Necessity – If your actions were necessary to prevent a greater harm from occurring, you may have the defence of necessity.

Goods in custody

What the prosecution must prove

Pursuant to section 527C of the Crimes Act 1900 (NSW), the prosecution must prove that you either:

  • Had something in your possession that was reasonably suspected of being stolen;
  • Made somebody else look after something on your behalf that was reasonably suspected of being stolen;
  • Had something on your premises (for example, in your house or car) that was reasonably suspected of being stolen – even if you did not live at the premises in question;
  • Gave another person custody of something to which they are not legally entitled.

The penalties

The maximum penalties that can be imposed by the courts under section 527 depend on what the good in question is.

Where it is a motor vehicle or vessel, or a part of a motor vehicle or vessel, the maximum penalty is 1 year imprisonment and/or a fine of $1,110.

For all other items, the maximum penalty that can be imposed by the court is 6 months’ imprisonment and/or a fine of $550.

Do you have a defence

Under the Act, it is a sufficient defence to a prosecution for an offence under subsection (1) if the defendant satisfies the court that he or she had no reasonable grounds for suspecting that the thing referred to in the charge was stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained.

The primary defence for a charge of Goods in Custody is proving that the goods were not in fact stolen or unlawfully obtained. If you satisfy the court of this, on the balance of probabilities, you will be acquitted of the charge.

Common ways to defend this charge are:

To show that you had in fact lawfully obtained the item, for example, by purchasing it or having a legitimate claim of right;

You may wish to argue that you:

  • were not physically in possession of an item;
  • had not given an item which you were in possession of to someone else temporarily;
  • did not have the item in your possession at your home; OR
  • did not have the item in your possession and that you did not give or sell it to someone else; or
  • To raise necessity or duress as the reason for your conduct.

Illegal use of motor vehicle

This is charge is often used in joyriding cases. The offence is actually taking a conveyance without the consent of the owner. It is contained in section 154A of the Crimes Act 1900 which states:

Any person who:

  • without having the consent of the owner or a person in lawful possession of a conveyance, takes and drives it, or takes it for the purpose of driving it, or secreting it, or obtaining a reward for its restoration or pretended restoration or for any other fraudulent purpose, or
  • knowing that any conveyance has been taken without such consent, drives it or allows himself or herself to be carried in or on it

shall be deemed guilty of larceny and liable to be indicted for that offence.

What the prosecution must prove

The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you:

  • Without the consent of the owner or person in lawful possession of the conveyance.
  • You took and drove, or took for the purpose of driving, or secreting, or obtaining a reward for the restoration or pretended restoration a conveyance.

A conveyance’ means any cart, wagon, cab, carriage, motor car, caravan, trailer, motor lorry, tractor, earth moving equipment, omnibus, motor or other bicycle, tank or other military vehicle, or any ship, or vessel, used or intended for navigation.

The penalties

The maximum penalty for the charge of illegal use of motor vehicle (Section 154A of the Crimes Act) is 5 years imprisonment.

In NSW, a court can impose any of the following penalties for a joy riding charge.

  • Prison Sentence
  • Home Detention
  • Intensive Corrections Order (ICO)
  • Suspended Sentence
  • Community Service Order (CSO)
  • Community Corrections Orders (CCO)
  • Good Behaviour Bond
  • Fine
  • Section 10A
  • Conditional Release Order (CRO)
  • Section 10

Do you have a defence

Possible defences to a taking a conveyance without the consent of the owner charge include but are not limited to:

Self defence

Duress

Necessity

Other crimes of dishonesty

If you have been charged with any offences related to theft, fraud or other crimes of dishonesty call Goldman and Co Lawyers for a free first consultation to assist you get the best possible outcome.

Other types of offences involving dishonesty include but are not limited to

  • Obtaining a financial advantage (Centrelink or the ATO)
  • Obtaining a financial advantage by deception
  • Dishonestly causing a loss (Centrelink or the ATO)
  • Proceeds of crime

Fraud

Fraud is a crime of dishonesty. A guilty conviction will damage your reputation and make it tough to hold a good job and progress your career. Most fraud charges fall under the category of general fraud, pursuant to section 192E of the Crimes Act 1900.

It is a complex area of law and a committed defence team can help you protect your reputation and your future.

Goldman and Co Lawyers criminal division are experts in fraud law and can assist you to get the best outcome if you have been charged with an offence

Fraud s 192E

The Section 192E Fraud charge covers the majority of conduct falling under the general umbrella of “fraud”.

What the prosecution must prove

To obtain a guilty conviction the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that:

  • A person who, by any deception, dishonestly:
  • obtained property belonging to another, or
  • obtained a financial advantage or caused a financial disadvantage
  • and that your actions were intentional or reckless

Although people often act dishonestly when engaging in certain transactions, deception is an essential element that is sometimes not able to be proved by the prosecution in general fraud cases.

Note that “dishonesty” and “deception” are two different elements of the offence of fraud and although they often go hand in hand, both must be proved in every fraud case.

“Dishonesty” is defined in Section 4B of the Crimes Act 1900 and means: “…dishonest according to the standards of ordinary people and known by the defendant to be dishonest according to the standards of ordinary people”

The property obtained has to belong to another person or entity and there must be the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property.

The penalties

If the charge is dealt with in the Local Court, 2 years imprisonment is the maximum sentence. The prosecution may elect to proceed in the District Court if the property involved is sizeable. The court can make an order for compensation.

Do you have a defence

Available defences include:

Where you honestly believed you were legally entitled to the property (claim of right)

Where you were coerced or threatened into the fraudulent conduct (duress)

Where you were suffering from a mental illness at the time of the fraudulent conduct

WWhere you engaged in the fraudulent conduct to prevent serious injury or danger (necessity)

General dishonesty

This is an offence against a Commonwealth entity. You don’t have to have profited from dishonesty or deception, it is sufficient that the Commonwealth entity suffered some form of loss as a result of your actions. The offence is contained in s 135.1 Commonwealth Criminal Code Act 1995

What the prosecution must prove

The elements of the offence with the prosecution must prove are:

  • That you obtained a gain or caused a loss to a Commonwealth entity;
  • That you did so dishonestly;
  • That you intended to obtain a gain or cause a loss through your actions.

Whether or not your actions are dishonest is gauged by whether ordinary people would consider your actions to be dishonest, and whether you knew that your actions were dishonest.

The penalties

The offence carries a maximum penalty of 10 years.

Do you have a defence

Possible defences include:

If you were threatened or coerced into obtaining the benefit or causing the loss (duress)

Where you made an honest and reasonable mistake of fact in relation to the benefit or loss (honest and reasonable mistake of fact)

Other fraud offences

The general approach in most circumstances by authorities is to rely on the general fraud NSW provision when charging someone with a typical fraud offence. The area of law is complex. As fraud is an offence of dishonesty, the impact on your career and your reputation can be far reaching.

Many government agencies, for example, have high recruitment thresholds when it comes of dishonesty offences.

If you are charged with a fraud offence, contact Goldman and Co Lawyers for a free first consultation to determine how best to proceed. Fraud offences include:

  • False Accusations
  • Embezzlement
  • Larceny by Clerk or Servant
  • Intention to Defraud by Destroying Accounts
  • Intention to Defraud by False or Misleading Statement
  • Intention to Deceive
  • False or Misleading Documents
  • Forgery
  • Possession of Forged Document

Rob

Robbery

Robbery is stealing with violence. Violence is an essential element to the charge. Jail time is a very real possibility if you are convicted.

If you are not guilty and wish to fight the charge, we can help you do it. You may have a defence or an explanation for your actions.

If you wish to admit the defence, an early guilty plea can get you a discount on sentence. Our experienced lawyers can help you highlight the positive factors in sentencing submission to reduce your sentence in the right circumstances.

The prosecution needs to prove different factors for each offence. The offences also carry different maximum penalties.

Robbery or stealing from a person

This is the least serious of the robbery charges. You must have used violence to take something from somebody and you must have had no intention to give it back to them. Violence does not have to be physical violence. You can verbally threaten somebody and be found guilty of robbery from a person. It constitutes violence if you have put somebody in fear of their safety.

What the prosecution must prove

To prove you guilty of a robbery offence the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • That you stole, or intended to steal, something from another person
  • Another person was present when you took the item
  • That you used violence to take the property from the other person

The penalties

The maximum penalty for robbery or stealing from the person (s 94 of the Crimes Act: 14 years imprisonment.

Do you have a defence

Common defences are that you had a claim of right to the property. Another is a standard defence to criminal charges called duress. Duress means that you were forced into the committing the robbery.

Because the penalties for robbery are so severe, the prosecution has to be put to the test. Robbery can be a difficult charge to prove.

Often it is difficult to identify the perpetrators because of poor or no CCTV footage. Witnesses can be unreliable. There may be a logical explanation as to why DNA evidence was obtained in a certain location. DNA evidence may be contaminated.

Goldman Lawyers and Co give you the best chance of a positive outcome if charged with robbery.

Aggravated robbery

This is robbery made more serious by aggravating factors. There are three aggravating factors set out in the Crimes Act 1900.

What the prosecution must prove

To prove you guilty of a robbery offence the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • That you stole, or intended to steal, something from another person
  • Another person was present when you took the item
  • That you used violence to take the property from the other person

In addition, the prosecution must prove that you physically injured another person or inflicted actual bodily harm (not necessarily permanent) or detained somebody against their will.

The penalties

For aggravated robbery (s 95 of the Crimes Act): 20 years imprisonment.

Do you have a defence

Because the penalties for robbery are so severe, the prosecution has to be put to the test. Robbery can be a difficult charge to prove.

Often it is difficult to identify the perpetrators because of poor or no CCTV footage. Witnesses can be unreliable. There may be a logical explanation as to why DNA evidence was obtained in a certain location. DNA evidence may be contaminated.

Goldman Lawyers and Co give you the best chance of a positive outcome if charged with robbery.

Aggravated robbery with wounding

To be found guilty of this offence the prosecution must prove that a robbery occurred and that you inflicted grievous bodily harm on a person in the conduct of the offence.

What the prosecution must prove

To prove you guilty of a robbery offence the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • That you stole, or intended to steal, something from another person
  • Another person was present when you took the item
  • That you used violence to take the property from the other person

In addition, the prosecution must prove that you committed the robbery in aggravating circumstances as defined in the Crimes Act and that you inflicted grievous bodily harm on somebody in the conduct of the offence. Grievous bodily harms is permanent or serious disfiguring.

The penalties

For aggravated robbery with wounding (s 96 of the Crimes Act): 25 years imprisonment.

Do you have a defence

Because the penalties for robbery are so severe, the prosecution has to be put to the test. Robbery can be a difficult charge to prove.

Often it is difficult to identify the perpetrators because of poor or no CCTV footage. Witnesses can be unreliable. There may be a logical explanation as to why DNA evidence was obtained in a certain location. DNA evidence may be contaminated.

Goldman Lawyers and Co give you the best chance of a positive outcome if charged with robbery.

Armed robbery, or robbery in company

Police charge you with this offence if the robbery occurred with at least one person other than the victim present or if you were armed with an offensive weapon.

What the prosecution must prove

To prove you guilty of a robbery offence the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • That you stole, or intended to steal, something from another person
  • Another person was present when you took the item
  • That you used violence to take the property from the other person

With either limb of this offence, there are additional elements that must be proven.

An offensive weapon must have been used in the robbery to sustain a charge of armed robbery. An offensive weapon is broadly defined and can include everyday items not normally considered. Guns and knives are offensive weapons as are syringes. Having the weapon on you is sufficient, you don’t have to have actually used it.

The prosecution cannot win a conviction for the charge of robbery in company If you were acting as a lookout or drove a car to and from the scene of the robbery. You have to have been physically present during the robbery to be charged with robbery in company.

The penalties

For armed robbery, or robbery in company (s 97 of the Crimes Act): maximum is 20 years imprisonment or 25 years imprisonment if you committed the armed robbery with a ‘dangerous weapon.’ A dangerous weapon can be a firearm or a knife.

Do you have a defence

Because the penalties for robbery are so severe, the prosecution must be put to the test. Robbery can be a difficult charge to prove.

Often it is difficult to identify the perpetrators because of poor or no CCTV footage. Witnesses can be unreliable. There may be a logical explanation as to why DNA evidence was obtained in a certain location. DNA evidence may be contaminated.

Goldman Lawyers and Co give you the best chance of a positive outcome if charged with robbery.

Armed robbery or robbery in company resulting in wounding

What the prosecution must prove

The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  • That you stole, or intended to steal, something from another person
  • Another person was present when you took the item
  • That you used violence to take the property from the other person
  • That there was at least one other person physically present at the time of the offence, and that they were involved in committing the robbery OR That you were armed with an offensive weapon; and
  • You wounded or inflicted grievous bodily harm on another person.

The penalties

For armed robbery or robbery in company resulting in wounding (s 98 of the Crimes Act): 25 years imprisonment.

Do you have a defence

Because the penalties for robbery are so severe, the prosecution has to be put to the test. Robbery can be a difficult charge to prove.

Often it is difficult to identify the perpetrators because of poor or no CCTV footage. Witnesses can be unreliable. There may be a logical explanation as to why DNA evidence was obtained in a certain location. DNA evidence may be contaminated.

Goldman Lawyers and Co give you the best chance of a positive outcome if charged with robbery

No stress and no obligation discussion
with our senior criminal lawyers

Speak directly with one of our senior lawyers for a no stress no obligation discussion on your criminal matter or Court attendance notice. All legal discussions are subject to legal professional privilege and are held in the strictest confidence whether you finally proceed to use our services or not.

Legal Services
Legal Services

Outstanding results in criminal defence matters

Our senior lawyers achieve outstanding results and standby you during the process. This is very important, as this is a stressful time for you and the consequences can be with you for the rest of your life.

A range of fees and fee packages that
suit your budget and needs

Speak directly with one of our senior lawyers for a no stress no obligation discussion on your criminal matter or Court attendance notice. We have a number of fee packages that you may download. Use our free case assessment form online so that we can provide you with our thoughts on the strategy. You can also speak to the lawyer that will defend you in court or assist in mitigating your sentence and plea.

Legal Services
Legal Services

Unique online pricing model – don’t
risk being stung by other lawyers

We have clear and transparent fee structures and are one of the leading firms that you can contact totally online and even download some of our special fee offers online. This saves us time and these efficiencies we pass on for the benefit of our clients in terms of reduced costs and transparency. No need to run around other law firms waiting for the lawyer to call you back. Everything you need to start is online.

X
Your enquiry form has been sent to our legal team and we
shall reply typically within 60 minutes.
Thank you